Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
07-41227•Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Javier Cortez, also known as Raul Cortez
07-41227Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit24.01.2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-41227
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JAVIER CORTEZ, also known as Raul Cortez
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:07-CR-161-ALL
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Javier Cortez is charged with being an unlawful user of a controlled
substance in knowing possession of a firearm, making a false written statement
to a licensed firearms dealer, and receiving a firearm with an altered or
obliterated serial number. Cortez appeals from an order of the district court
denying his motion to reconsider the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
January 24, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 07-41227
2
The district court’s decision rests upon its conclusion that Cortez has failed
to establish that any condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
ensure the safety of the community if Cortez is released. 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e)
& (f). Absent an error of law, this court will uphold a district court’s pretrial
detention order if it is supported by the proceedings below. United States v.
Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 585 (5th Cir. 1992). The same standard of review
applies to the denial of a motion to reconsider a detention order. United States
v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir. 1989).
Analysis of the factors set forth in § 3142(g) indicates that the district
court’s conclusions are supported by the proceedings below. See Rueben, 974
F.2d at 586. The pretrial detention order is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.