Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-20485•Summary Calendar DEMARIO WALKER v. United States of America
08-20485Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit03.11.2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-20485
Summary Calendar
DEMARIO WALKER
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS;
President GEORGE W BUSH; GOVERNOR OF TEXAS; UNITED STATES
ARMY
Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:08-CV-1555
Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Demario Walker, a Mississippi Department of
Corrections inmate, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Texas on May 16, 2008. Walker,
proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, challenged the federal Defense of
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 3, 2008
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 08-20485
2
Marriage Act and the Army’s “don’t ask–don’t tell” policy, complaining that his
rights to due process and equal protection were violated.
On May 12, 2008 – four days before this suit was filed – Walker had filed
another suit raising identical claims against the same defendants in the U. S.
District Court for the Western District of Texas, Civil Action 1:08cv0381.
Walker concedes that the complaint in the present suit was a photocopy of his
earlier complaint filed in the Western District of Texas. The second complaint,
the one filed in the Southern District of Texas, was dismissed.
A district court may dismiss a complaint that is duplicative of another
federal lawsuit filed by the same plaintiff. Pittman v. Moore, 980 F.2d 994, 995
(5th Cir. 1993). There certainly is such duplication here. Consequently, the
district court did not err in dismissing what was Walker’s second complaint on
the same matter.
We AFFIRM.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.