Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-60215•Simon v. DOWCP, et al
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 19-60215
Clarence J. Simon,
Petitioner,
versus
Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs,
United States Department of Labor;
Longnecker Properties, incorporated;
Seabright insurance company,
Respondents.
Petition for Review of an Order
of the Benefits Review Board
BRB No. 17-0579
Before Jolly, Jones, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
Per curiam:
*
Clarence Simon appeals from an adverse decision of the Benefits
Review Board, which affirmed an administrative law judge ruling that Simon
*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set
forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 19-60215 Document: 00515534631 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2020
No. 19-60215
2
is barred from recovering benefits because he previously settled his claim
with a third party without obtaining the employer’s (Longnecker’s) prior
written approval. See 33 U.S.C. § 933(g). The administrative law judge held
the settlement existed and was valid based on collateral estoppel, and the
estoppel derived from an earlier federal court case. See Simon v. Longnecker
Properties, Inc., No. 15-31113, 671 Fed App’x. 277 (Mem.)(5
th
Cir. Dec. 7,
2016). Our review considers whether the Benefits Review Board “correctly
concluded that the [ALJ’s] order was supported by substantial evidence on
the record as a whole and is in accordance with the law.” Ingalls Shipbuilding,
Inc. v. Director, OWCP, 991 F.2d 163, 165 (5
th
Cir. 1993). We have carefully
reviewed the record in this case, together with the parties’ briefs. Having
done so, we find no error of fact or law. AFFIRMED.
Case: 19-60215 Document: 00515534631 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2020
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.