Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-10243•United States v. Harrison
20-10243Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit08.10.2020
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 20-10243
Conference Calendar
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Earl Tyrone Love Harrison,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:19-CR-61-3
Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Earl Tyrone Love Harrison has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Harrison has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 8, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-10243 Document: 00515594913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2020
No. 20-10243
2
developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Harrison’s claim of
ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim
without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d
829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein, as well as Harrison’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case: 20-10243 Document: 00515594913 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/08/2020
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.