Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-40286•United States v. Garcia-Melchor
20-40286Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit05.11.2020
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 20-40286
Conference Calendar
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Gonzalo Garcia-Melchor,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:19-CR-320-1
Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gonzalo Garcia-
Melchor has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Melchor has filed a response. The record
*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 5, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-40286 Document: 00515627892 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/05/2020
No. 20-40286
2
is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Garcia-
Melchor’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to
consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States
v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein, as well as Garcia-Melchor’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case: 20-40286 Document: 00515627892 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/05/2020
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.