Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-50096•United States v. Gama-Alvarez
20-50096Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit10.08.2020
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
No. 20-50096
Conference Calendar
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee
,
versus
Pedro Gama-Alvarez, also known as Guero, also known as El
Lobo,
Defendant—Appellant
.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:12-CR-1578-1
Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Gama-Alvarez has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5
TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 10, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-50096 Document: 00515520897 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2020
No. 20-50096
2
Cir. 2011). Gama-Alvarez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Gama-Alvarez claims of
ineffective assistance of counsel or any claim that his plea was coerced; we
therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral
review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014); United
States v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 176-78 & n.11 (5th Cir. 1984).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein, as well as Gama-Alvarez’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5
TH CIR. R. 42.2. Gama-Alvarez’s
motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED. See United States
v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Case: 20-50096 Document: 00515520897 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2020
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.