United States v. Valdez

United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50270
Conference Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Mariano Valdez, III, also known as Huesos, also known as Rage,
also known as Mariano Valdez,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:17-CR-391-5

Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Mariano Valdez, III, has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 28, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-50270 Document: 00515619649 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2020

No. 20-50270
2
Cir. 2011). Valdez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Valdez’s claims of
ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims
without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d
829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein, as well as Valdez’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case: 20-50270 Document: 00515619649 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2020