United States v. Rodriguez

20-50275Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit09.09.2020

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50275
Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Margarito Rodriguez,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:19-CR-1174-1

Before Southwick, Duncan, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
Margarito Rodriguez appeals his above-guidelines sentence of 30
months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release following his
guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. Rodriguez
asserts that the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 9, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 20-50275 Document: 00515556848 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2020

No. 20-50275
2
§ 1326(b)(2), which increased the maximum term of imprisonment to 20
years and the maximum term of supervised release to three years, is
unconstitutional because the fact of a prior conviction is treated as a
sentencing factor rather than as an element of the offense that must be alleged
in the indictment and proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
As Rodriguez concedes, this issue is foreclosed by the Supreme
Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 239-47
(1998). See United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United
States v. Rojas-Luna, 522 F.3d 502, 505-06 (5th Cir. 2008). Thus, summary
affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d
1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).
Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time
to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Case: 20-50275 Document: 00515556848 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/09/2020

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.