United States of America v. Eric Phillip Romero

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2872
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Eric Phillip Romero
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
____________
Submitted: April 4, 2013
Filed: April 8, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Eric Romero appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty
to a drug charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders
1The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court abused its discretion
by imposing a prison term that is greater than necessary and unreasonable.
Upon careful review, this court concludes that the district court did not abuse
its discretion in sentencing Romero. See United States v. Montgomery, 525 F.3d 627,
629 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion
standard). This court independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and found no nonfrivolous issues.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the district court
is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --