Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
12-3494•Mayme Brown v. Mortgage Electronic
12-3494Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.12.2013
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1475
___________________________
Lucindo A. Mazariegos-Herrera; Daisy Mabel Mazariegos; Jason J.A.
Mazariegos-Garcia; Benjamin Leiva Masariegos
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: November 20, 2013
Filed: December 5, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Lucindo Mazariegos-Herrera, his wife Daisy Mazariegos, his son Jason
Mazariegos-Garcia, and his uncle Benjamin Leiva Masariegos, citizens of Guatemala,
petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming
an immigration judge’s denial of their renewed and consolidated applications for
-- 1 of 2 --
asylum and withholding of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s
determination that the asylum application of Mazariegos-Herrera and his derivative
beneficiaries was barred as untimely filed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); Ngure v.
Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 975, 988–89 (8th Cir. 2004). After careful review, we conclude
that the BIA’s denial of asylum as to Leiva Masariegos—and its denial of withholding
of removal as to all petitioners—was supported by substantial evidence on the record
as a whole. See Cubillos v. Holder, 565 F.3d 1054, 1056 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of
review for denial of asylum); Menjivar v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 918, 920–22 (8th Cir.
2005) (standard of review for denial of withholding of removal; discussing “unwilling
or unable to control” standard for non-governmental persecution). Accordingly, we
deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.