Richard Lee Oprenchak, Jr. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, and its affiliates and subsidiaries

13-2592Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.09.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3694
___________________________
Richard Lee Oprenchak, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, and its affiliates and subsidiaries
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: September 5, 2014
Filed: September 24, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Richard Lee Oprenchak, Jr., appeals the district court’s adverse grant of1
summary judgment in his diversity action against his former employer, American
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of1
Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

Family Mutual Insurance Company, and its affiliates and subsidiaries (American
Family). Having conducted de novo review of the record and carefully considered
Oprenchak’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court that Oprenchak2
did not adequately counter American Family’s evidence showing that there were no
genuine issues of material fact on Oprenchak’s state law claims. See Young v.
Builders Steel Co., 754 F.3d 573, 577 (8th Cir. 2014). The judgment of the district
court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
We decline to consider the matters Oprenchak raises for the first time on2
appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.