United States of America v. Justin Joseph Halter

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-2317
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Justin Joseph Halter
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
____________
Submitted: October 15, 2014
Filed: October 21, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Justin Halter directly appeals following the district court’s 1 revocation of his
supervised release. He argues that the court abused its discretion in revoking
supervised release and in imposing a 9-month prison sentence.
We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking supervised
release based on its finding that Halter had violated his release conditions, given
Halter’s admissions and the testimony of his probation officer, which the court was
entitled to credit. See United States v. Edwards, 400 F.3d 591, 592 (8th Cir. 2005)
(per curiam) (given defendant’s admission of violation, there was no clear error in fact
findings supporting revocation, and no abuse of discretion in decision to revoke);
United States v. Carothers, 337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 2003) (court’s credibility
determinations at revocation hearing are virtually unreviewable on appeal). We also
conclude that the within-Guidelines-range revocation sentence is not unreasonable.
See United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw.
______________________________
1The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --