Chima Iheke v. Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCI-Forrest City

14-1883Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.12.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-2223
___________________________
Chima Iheke
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCI-Forrest City
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: December 2, 2014
Filed: December 4, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Federal inmate Chima Iheke appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 281
U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. Following careful review of the record
and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the court did not err in dismissing the
petition because 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief is neither inadequate nor ineffective to test
the legality of Iheke’s detention. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d
1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003) (de novo review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.