Calvin Hammock v. NASA Headquarters

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1301
___________________________
Calvin Hammock
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
NASA Headquarters; Department of Defense; Space Exploration Technologies
Space X; Apple; Blackberry (Curve) Corporation; Virgin Mobile; Mediacom
WiFi; American Water Iowa; Unknown Defendants
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
____________
Submitted: October 3, 2016
Filed: October 4, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Calvin Hammock appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se1
complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order
because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that Hammock failed
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662,
678 (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Kelly v. City of
Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment
of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the Southern District of Iowa.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --