Randal Mauderer v. Iowa Attorney General’s Office, et al.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3866
___________________________
Randal Mauderer
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Iowa Attorney General’s Office, et al.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: March 23, 2017
Filed: March 28, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Randal Mauderer appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C.1
§ 1983 action, in which he alleged that his recommended participation in a Sex
The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern1
District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

Offender Treatment Program violated his constitutional rights; and that the conditions
of his exercise privileges while in segregation violated both his constitutional rights
and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude that the action was properly
dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d
781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A(b) dismissal is reviewed de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the appellate motions.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --