Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-3672•Teresa Lorenz v. The Bank of New York Mellon; EMC Mortgage Corporation
15-3672Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.07.2017
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3716
___________________________
Teresa Lorenz
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
The Bank of New York Mellon; EMC Mortgage Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
Southstar Funding LLC
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: July 14, 2017
Filed: July 28, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Teresa Lorenz appeals from an order of the District Court granting defendants’1
motions to dismiss and for summary judgment in this removed action for breach of
contract and slander of title, which arose from the sale and assignment of Lorenz’s
home mortgage. After de novo review, we affirm for the reasons explained in the
District Court’s thorough opinion. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d2
1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing de novo a dismissal for failure to state a
claim); Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (reviewing
de novo an order granting summary judgment); see also 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the1
District of Minnesota.
Because Lorenz failed to file with the District Court objections to the2
Magistrate Judge’s order denying in part leave to amend the complaint, that order is
not properly before us. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); Daley v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., 415
F.3d 889, 893 n.9 (8th Cir. 2005).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.