Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-2849•Donnie Ray Dumas v. Matthew A. Falkner; Gary L. Broyles
16-2849Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.12.2017
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1942
___________________________
Donnie Ray Dumas
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Matthew A. Falkner; Gary L. Broyles
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: December 7, 2017
Filed: December 12, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Donnie Ray Dumas appeals after the District Court granted summary judgment1
to defendants in his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Viewing the summary judgment
record in the light most favorable to Dumas and drawing all reasonable inferences in
his favor, we agree with the District Court that summary judgment was warranted.
See Clay v. Credit Bureau Enters., Inc., 754 F.3d 535, 539 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard
of review). We further conclude that the court did not err in denying Dumas’s motion
to add a habeas claim against the United States Parole Commission. See Kozlov v.
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., 818 F.3d 380, 394–95 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard
of review). We affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.