Captiva Lake Investments v. Fidelity National Title Ins.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1252
___________________________
Manuel De Jesus Garcia Ortiz
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: February 20, 2017
Filed: February 26, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Manuel Garcia Ortiz petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an

-- 1 of 2 --

immigration judge (IJ), which denied him asylum and withholding of removal. Ortiz1
sought immigration relief based on his membership in the particular social group
“former members of the military suffering gang threats and violence due to
noninvolvement in their criminal behavior.”
After careful consideration of Ortiz’s arguments and the record, we conclude
that substantial evidence supports the finding that he failed to show past persecution
in Guatemala, a well-founded fear of future persecution there, or a clear probability
of future persecution there, due to one of the five protected grounds: race, religion,
nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. See 8
U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i); De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir.
2013) (standard of review); Matul-Hernandez v. Holder, 685 F.3d 707, 711-13 (8th
Cir. 2012). Specifically, we determine that: (1) Ortiz’s proposed group does not
constitute a particular social group, see Gaitan v. Holder, 671 F.3d 678, 682 (8th Cir.
2012); (2) to the extent Ortiz feared general violence in Guatemala, his fear was not
based on a protected ground, see Al Yatim v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 584, 588-89 (8th
Cir. 2008); and (3) he did not establish that the Guatemalan government was unable
or unwilling to control the private actors he fears, see Gutierrez-Vidal v. Holder, 709
F.3d 728, 732 (8th Cir. 2013).
The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The IJ’s denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture is not on1
appeal. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004).
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --