Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1854•Jeffrey Paul Miller v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
16-1854Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.02.2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2043
___________________________
Jeffrey Paul Miller
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
____________
Submitted: February 7, 2018
Filed: February 12, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Paul Miller appeals the order of the district court affirming the1
Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
income. For reversal, Miller contends that the ALJ (1) did not give sufficient weight
to the cognitive problems caused by his diabetes and joint pain; (2) erred in not
according controlling weight to his treating physician’s assessment; (3) did not accord
sufficient weight to the effects of his musculoskeletal impairments; and (4) erred in
determining he could perform unskilled light work. Following careful review of the
parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that the ALJ’s
determinations are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and
that Miller’s arguments do not support reversal. See Andrews v. Colvin, 791 F.3d
923, 928 (8th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.