Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-2654•Derrick Wayne Walker v. Tyson Foods Inc
16-2654Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.05.2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2280
___________________________
Derrick Wayne Walker
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Tyson Foods Inc
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
____________
Submitted: May 9, 2018
Filed: May 24, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Derrick Walker appeals after the district court1 adversely granted a motion to
dismiss his complaint as untimely or in the alternative for summary judgment on the
1The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
merits. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal,
we conclude that the district court did not err in its decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-
5(f)(1) (suit filed under Title VII must be brought within ninety days after receipt of
right-to-sue letter from Equal Employment Opportunity Commission); Hill v. John
Chezik Imps., 869 F.2d 1122, 1123-24 (8th Cir. 1989) (discussing equitable tolling);
see also Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en
banc) (standard of review for summary judgment decisions). We also conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Walker appointed counsel.
See Phillips v. Jasper Cty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review;
there is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil cases).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.