Lorraine Black v. Life Unlimited/Concern Care

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1258
___________________________
Lorraine Black
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Life Unlimited/Concern Care
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
State of Missouri Department of Mental Health
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: October 9, 2018
Filed: October 17, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Lorraine Black appeals after the district court dismissed her civil rights action,1
upon the motion of defendant Life Unlimited/Concern Care. Upon careful de novo
review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting defendant’s motion
to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6),
see Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting forth the
standard of review); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78 (2009)
(discussing the pleading standard under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8), and we find no other basis
for reversal.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --