Rudy Stanko, individually v. South Dakota State Brand Board

17-2562Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.12.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1791
___________________________
Rudy Stanko, individually, and on behalf of similarly situated cattle ranchers on
the Pine Ridge Reservation and border towns
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
South Dakota State Brand Board; Jake Schofield, individually and in his official
capacity as South Dakota State Brand Inspector; Philip Livestock Auction; Thor
Roseth, individually and as owner of the Philip Livestock Auction; Defendants 1x
through 4x, individually, will be named after discovery
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City
____________
Submitted: December 19, 2018
Filed: December 26, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Rudy Stanko appeals from the order of the District Court dismissing his civil1
action for lack of standing. We have reviewed the record and considered the parties’
arguments, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court. See Hughes v.
City of Cedar Rapids, 840 F.3d 987, 991 (8th Cir. 2016) (“This court reviews
standing determinations de novo.”). See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Stanko’s pending
motion.
______________________________
The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the District of South Dakota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.