Andrew Stephen Williams v. Minnesota Department of Corrections

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-2037
___________________________
Andrew Stephen Williams
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Minnesota Department of Corrections; Tom Roy; Eddie Miles; Minnesota
Correctional Facility-Faribault, Mailroom Department; Minnesota Correctional
Facility-Faribault, Property Department; Rice County; City of Faribault;
Washington County; City of Bayport; County of Dakota; City of Hastings
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: May 1, 2019
Filed: May 6, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Andrew Williams appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se complaint.1
Having carefully reviewed the record as to the claims Williams raises on appeal, and
the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Plymouth Cty.
v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review of Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b) dismissal order). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District1
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Hildy
Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --