Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1238•United States v. Donald Stewart
19-1238Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit27.09.2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3560
___________________________
Doyle Dennis Smith
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Appeal from The United States Tax Court
____________
Submitted: August 28, 2019
Filed: September 4, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Doyle Smith appeals the tax court’s dismissal of his petition after he failed to1
pay the filing fee. Following careful review, we conclude that the tax court did not
err in dismissing Smith’s petition. See Tax Ct. Rule 20(d) (fee of $60 shall be paid
The Honorable Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court.1
-- 1 of 2 --
at time petition is filed; fee may be waived if petitioner shows inability to pay); Tax
Ct. Rule 123(b) (tax court may dismiss case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or
failure to comply with Tax Court Rules); Long v. Comm’r, 742 F.2d 1141, 1143 (8th
Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal under Rule 123(b)). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.