Peter R. Wright v. Judge Frank Magill; Hennepin County 4th District Court

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1480
___________________________
Peter R. Wright
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Judge Frank Magill; Hennepin County 4th District Court
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: October 2, 2019
Filed: October 7, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Peter Wright appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil action raising1
claims related to an unsuccessful action he brought in state court. After careful
review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal
was proper. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991) (per curiam) (discussing
judicial immunity); Harris v. Mo. Court of Appeals, 787 F.2d 427, 429 (8th Cir.
1986) (stating that state courts possess Eleventh Amendment immunity).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --