Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-1425•United States v. Joseph Dean Mork
18-1425Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit27.11.2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1236
___________________________
Onesmus Bogonko Daniel
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: November 4, 2019
Filed: November 5, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kenyan citizen Onesmus Daniel petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decisions of an immigration
judge, which granted the Department of Homeland Security’s motion to reconsider
a decision to terminate removal proceedings, and denied him cancellation of
-- 1 of 2 --
removal.1 Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and after careful consideration
of the petition, this court finds no basis for reversal.
The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The agency’s remaining findings — including the denial of asylum,
withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture, and voluntary
departure—are not before this panel. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751,
756 (8th Cir. 2004) (claim not raised in opening brief is waived).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.