Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1035•Lateshia Patillo v. Sysco Arkansas, a Division of Sysco USA II, LLC, originally Sued As Sysco Foods of…
19-1035Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28.02.2020
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2203
___________________________
Lateshia Patillo
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Sysco Arkansas, a Division of Sysco USA II, LLC, originally Sued As Sysco
Foods of Arkansas LLC, other Sysco USA II LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: February 19, 2020
Filed: February 24, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Lateshia Patillo appeals after the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in this employment discrimination action. Patillo’s notice of appeal (NOA)
designated her intent to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment.
In her brief, however, she identifies only decisions by the district court prior to the
summary judgment order. We conclude that the issues identified by Patillo are
outside the scope of this appeal. See USCOC of Greater Mo. v. City of Ferguson, 583
F.3d 1035, 1040 (8th Cir. 2009) (no jurisdiction to decide issues on appeal that were
not designated, and therefore preserved, in NOA); cf. Chambers v. City of Fordyce,
508 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (although timely NOA as to final
order is potentially effective to appeal earlier orders, NOA must designate judgment,
order, or part thereof being appealed). We further conclude that Patillo has waived
any issues pertaining to the summary judgment order, as she has not meaningfully
identified or argued any such issues on appeal. See Ahlberg v. Chrysler Corp., 481
F.3d 630, 638 (8th Cir. 2007) (points not meaningfully argued on appeal are waived).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, now retired.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.