Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1398•United States of America v. Cornelius Anderson
19-1398Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.06.2020
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3106
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Cornelius Anderson
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: May 27, 2020
Filed: June 4, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
The district court1 gave Cornelius Anderson a 60-month prison sentence for
conspiring to sell stolen firearms. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 922(j). In an Anders brief,
1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
Anderson’s counsel seeks permission to withdraw and challenges a sentence
enhancement for trafficking firearms and the lack of a reduction for acceptance of
responsibility. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
There is adequate support in the record for the firearms-trafficking
enhancement. See United States v. Willett, 623 F.3d 546, 548–49 (8th Cir. 2010)
(discussing the standard of review); see also U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5). Anderson’s
plea stipulations and other evidence established that he personally facilitated the sale
of at least two stolen firearms. See Willett, 623 F.3d at 549. The district court also
had reason to deny an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, because Anderson
later attempted to deny at sentencing what he had already admitted in his plea
agreement. See United States v. Davis, 875 F.3d 869, 875 (8th Cir. 2017) (affirming
the denial of a reduction because the defendant had “denied much of the conduct
relevant to her convictions”).
Finally, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), and conclude that there are no other non-frivolous issues for
appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel permission to
withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.