Quintin Ray v. Renaissance St. Louis Airport Hotel, (Schulte Hospitality Group)

20-1785Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.11.2020

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-1785
___________________________
Quintin Ray
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Renaissance St. Louis Airport Hotel, (Schulte Hospitality Group)
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: November 23, 2020
Filed: November 30, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this Title VII action, Quintin Ray appeals the district court’s1 denial of his
motion for reconsideration. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its
1The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

discretion. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005) (per
curiam) (Rule 60(b) authorizes relief only in most exceptional cases). The judgment
is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.