Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-2001•James W. Shaughnessy v. Edward P. Southern, MD
20-2001Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.08.2021
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-1463
___________________________
James W. Shaughnessy
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Edward P. Southern, MD
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: August 16, 2021
Filed: August 19, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
James Shaughnessy appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action for
lack of personal jurisdiction. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that
1The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Creative Calling
Sols., Inc. v. LF Beauty Ltd., 799 F.3d 975, 979 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review;
action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction if evidence, viewed in light
most favorable to plaintiff, is sufficient to support conclusion that exercise of
personal jurisdiction over defendant is proper); Conn v. Zakharov, 667 F.3d 705,
717-20 (6th Cir. 2012) (defendant’s ownership of property in and occasional travel
to forum state did not establish prima facie case of general personal jurisdiction).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.