Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-1707•United States of America v. Dyqwon D. Brown
21-1707Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit29.07.2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1383
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dyqwon D. Brown
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: June 28, 2022
Filed: July 1, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dyqwon Brown received a 96-month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty
to being a felon in possession of ammunition. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1),
924(a)(2). As part of the plea agreement, he waived the right to appeal his
conviction and sentence, except for, as relevant here, ineffective assistance of
counsel. An Anders brief questions the enforceability of the plea agreement, the
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed by the district court,1 and
counsel’s performance. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
The appeal waiver, which is enforceable, covers all but one of these issues.
See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the validity
of an appeal waiver de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir.
2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls
within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into
the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a
miscarriage of justice). For that one, ineffective assistance of counsel, it is too early
to consider it given the state of the record. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez,
449 F.3d 824, 826–27 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that this type of claim is “usually
best litigated in collateral proceedings”).
Finally, we have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no
other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Missouri.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.