Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-3885•Dean Christiansen v. Christopher Eral
21-3885Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.10.2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-1865
___________________________
Rafael Antonio Segovia-Yanes
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: September 28, 2022
Filed: October 3, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Rafael Segovia-Yanes, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial of his application
for cancellation of removal. Segovia argues that removing him would cause
“exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to his American-citizen children. 8
U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). We will not consider this argument because Segovia
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
failed to raise it before the Board. See Bakor v. Barr, 958 F.3d 732, 739 (8th Cir.
2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2566 (2021); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (requiring
exhaustion of administrative remedies before judicial review). We accordingly
dismiss the petition for review.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.