United States of America v. Jacob Dylan Ness

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1310
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jacob Dylan Ness
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: September 19, 2022
Filed: November 10, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
After Jacob Ness violated the conditions of probation by using methamphetamine,
the district court1 varied upward and gave him a 27-month prison sentence. See 18
U.S.C. § 3565(a). Although he argues that the sentence is too long, we affirm.
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
We conclude that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v.
Michael, 12 F.4th 858, 860 (8th Cir. 2021) (stating that a within-Guidelines sentence is
presumed reasonable). The record establishes that the district court sufficiently
considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on an
improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment, see United States v. Leonard, 785
F.3d 303, 306–07 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam). In its view, Ness presented a “clear
danger to the community” based on his “outrageous criminal behavior,” even though he
was “trying to remain sober.” Cf. Michael, 12 F.4th at 860–61 (affirming an upward
departure based on the district court’s decision “to give greater weight to the risk to the
public”). Just because Ness believes the court should have weighed these factors
differently does not mean the court abused its discretion. See United States v.
Holdsworth, 830 F.3d 779, 786 (8th Cir. 2016).
We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --