United States of America v. Jeremy Jeremiah Canady

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-2532
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Jeremy Jeremiah Canady,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: November 16, 2022
Filed: November 29, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jeremy Canady appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 36 months in prison. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and
1The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the
revocation sentence.
Upon careful review, we conclude that Canady’s sentence was not
unreasonable, as there was no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant
factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a
clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432
F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th Cir. 2006); see also United States v. Elodio-Benitez, 672 F.3d
584, 586 (8th Cir. 2012). The revocation sentence and term of supervised release are
within the statutory maximum, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A),
and the district court stated that it had considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, see
United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --