Angela Basham v. Midland Funding LLC; Gamache & Myers, P.C.; Midland Credit Management, Inc.

21-4016Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.01.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1931
___________________________
Angela Basham
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Midland Funding LLC; Gamache & Myers, P.C.; Midland Credit Management,
Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: December 29, 2022
Filed: January 6, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Angela Basham appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to
three companies she accused of harassing her while trying to collect credit-card
1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
debts. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal,
we conclude that there are no material facts in dispute and the debt collectors are
entitled to judgment as a matter of law.2 See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921
(8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing a grant of summary judgment de novo); see also Fed. R.
Civ. P. 56(c)(1) (instructing parties to cite “materials in the record” when trying to
show that a fact is “genuinely disputed” at the summary-judgment stage). We
accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
2 We also deny Basham’s motion to appoint appellate counsel.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.