United States of America v. Ralph A. Ross, also known as R.A.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-2678
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Ralph A. Ross, also known as R.A.
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: April 11, 2023
Filed: May 1, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Ralph Ross pleaded guilty to one count of misprision of a felony and was
sentenced to 36 months’ imprisonment. Ross appealed, arguing the district court
relied on disputed allegations from the Presentence Investigation Report when
imposing the sentence. We agreed and remanded for a resentencing to “be
conducted on the existing record.” United States v. Ross, No. 21-2299, 2022 WL

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
1013983, at *1 (8th Cir. Apr. 5, 2022). On remand, the district court again imposed
a 36-month sentence.
Ross again appeals, seeking a second remand. He argues that the district
court1 impermissibly relied on factors outside the scope of the first remand when it
imposed a sentence above the calculated advisory Guidelines range of 24–30
months. However, while Ross’s appeal was pending, he was released from custody.
Ross raises no challenge on appeal other than to the length of his custodial sentence,
and he asserts no possible collateral consequences. As a result, this court can grant
Ross no effective relief, and his challenge to the length of his sentence is moot. See
United States v. Aden, 830 F.3d 812, 816–17 (8th Cir. 2016); Owen v. United States,
930 F.3d 989, 990–91 (8th Cir. 2019).
Ross’s appeal is dismissed as moot.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.

-- 2 of 2 --