Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
22-2324•Charles L. Burgett v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
22-2324Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.08.2023
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-3632
___________________________
Charles L. Burgett
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: July 26, 2023
Filed: August 1, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Burgett appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. Upon careful
1The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we conclude that the grant of
summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Said
v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (de novo review of grant of
summary judgment). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of
Burgett’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. See Schoffstall v. Henderson, 223 F.3d 818,
827 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.