United States of America v. Jessie Ivory, also known as Jesse Holliday

22-3115Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.04.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1209
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jessie Ivory, also known as Jesse Holliday
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: April 24, 2024
Filed: April 29, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jessie Ivory appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and
sentenced him to a term of imprisonment within the advisory Sentencing Guidelines
1The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging
the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
We conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See United
States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). There is no
indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant
weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment.
See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (considerations for
reasonableness of sentence); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.
2009) (sentence within Guidelines range presumptively reasonable).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.