Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-1109•United States of America v. Craig Allen
23-1109Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31.07.2024
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1598
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Craig Allen
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: July 5, 2024
Filed: July 11, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Craig Allen appeals after the district court1 denied his motion seeking a
sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). His counsel has filed a motion to
1The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the denial. Allen has also filed a pro se
brief.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in finding that a reduction was not warranted. See United States v. Boyd,
819 F.3d 1054, 1056 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (district court’s decision whether
to grant authorized § 3582(c)(2) motion is reviewed for an abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.