United States of America v. Christopher Charles Mathis

24-1001Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.04.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-2179
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Christopher Charles Mathis
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: April 22, 2025
Filed: April 25, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Mathis received a 195-month prison sentence after he pleaded
guilty to possessing a firearm as a felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). An Anders

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
brief suggests the district court1 should not have sentenced him under the Armed
Career Criminal Act. See id. § 924(e); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Porter, 409 F.3d 910, 917 (8th
Cir. 2005) (describing the plain-error standard of review). The indictment charged
Mathis with committing his prior offenses “on occasions different from one
another,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), and he “freely admitted” doing so “in [his] guilty
plea,” Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821, 834 (2024). Once he did, there was
no need to submit the different-occasions question to a jury. See id.
We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other
non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). We
accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission
to withdraw.
______________________________
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.