United States of America v. Christopher John Egenberger

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1113
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Christopher John Egenberger
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
____________
Submitted: July 16, 2025
Filed: July 21, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Egenberger appeals after the district court1 revoked Egenberger’s
supervised release and imposed a sentence of 24 months in prison followed by 48
1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

months of supervised release. Egenberger’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has
filed a brief challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable.
After reviewing the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its
discretion in sentencing Egenberger. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917
(8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence reviewed under
deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). There is no indication the court overlooked
a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or
committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United
States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th Cir. 2006) (reciting factors to discern
whether revocation sentence is unreasonable).
Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --