Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-3019•Serandon Ramon Starling v. Cantrell Bass, Lt., Tucker Max, ADC; Antonio Johnson, Major, Tucker Max, ADC
23-3019Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30.01.2026
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1702
___________________________
Serandon Ramon Starling
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Cantrell Bass, Lt., Tucker Max, ADC; Antonio Johnson, Major, Tucker Max, ADC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: January 14, 2026
Filed: January 21, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Serandon Starling appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following a de novo review, we
1The Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See
Johnson v. Carroll, 658 F.3d 819, 825 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.