Dawn J. Duncan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.; National Default Servicing Corporation

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAWN J. DUNCAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,
INC.; NATIONAL DEFAULT
SERVICING CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 11-17033
D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00864-JCM-
PAL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 13, 2012**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Dawn J. Duncan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
her diversity action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction
FILED
NOV 20 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-17033 2
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068,
1072 (9th Cir. 2005), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Duncan’s action because Duncan failed
to allege facts sufficient to show that the notice and guide regarding a short sale
option constituted an enforceable contract. See May v. Anderson, 119 P.3d 1254,
1257 (Nev. 2005) (“Basic contract principles require, for an enforceable contract,
an offer and acceptance, meeting of the minds, and consideration.”).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --