In the Matter of: LODGEBUILDER, INC., BRENDA MOODY WHINERY v. U.S. TRUSTEE, Trustee -

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In the Matter of: LODGEBUILDER, INC.,
BRENDA MOODY WHINERY, Creditor
Trustee for Fort Defiance Housing
Corporation, Inc.,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
U.S. TRUSTEE,
Trustee - Appellee,
WILLIAM AUBREY; BRENDA B.
TODD,
Defendants - Appellants.
No. 11-15873
D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01971-PMP-
PAL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding
FILED
NOV 21 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 3 --

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
11-15873 2
Submitted November 13, 2012**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
William Aubrey and Brenda B. Todd appeal pro se from the district court’s
order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that their debt to Fort
Defiance Housing Corp. was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review decisions of the bankruptcy
court independently without deference to the district court’s determinations,
Leichty v. Neary, (In re Strand), 375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.
The bankruptcy court properly determined that the debt in question was
nondischargeable because a prior decision between the parties necessarily decided
that the money at issue was obtained by “false pretenses” and that Aubrey and
Todd inflicted “willful and malicious injury” on Fort Defiance Housing Corp. 11
U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(6); Ormsby v. First Am. Title Co. of Nev. (In re
Ormsby), 591 F.3d 1199, 1206-07 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth elements under
§ 523(a)(6)); Harmon v. Kobrin (In re Harmon), 250 F.3d 1240, 1245-46 (9th Cir.
2001) (explaining that “[p]rinciples of collateral estoppel apply to proceedings
seeking exceptions from discharge brought under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a),” and setting

-- 2 of 3 --

11-15873 3
forth elements under § 523(a)(2)(A)).
Appellants’ request for a stay is denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 3 of 3 --