Hassan Anawarul v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HASSAN ANAWARUL,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
Nos. 08-72747
09-74072
Agency No. A070-914-854
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted May 8, 2013
Pasadena, California
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, PAEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Anawarul Hassan, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of
two decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The first dismissed his
appeal of an Immigration Judge’s denial of Hassan’s first untimely motion to
reopen. The second denied Hassan’s second untimely motion to reopen. We have
jurisdiction over his petitions under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). The denial of a motion
FILED
MAY 15 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960,
964 (9th Cir. 2002).
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hassan’s motions to reopen
where the motions were filed more than twelve years after the order of removal and
Hassan has failed to demonstrate changed country conditions in Bangladesh. 8
U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7); see also 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2, 1003.23.
To the extent Hassan argues that there were changed country conditions
because his marriage to Shira Hussain renders him a member of a particular social
group, he did not exhaust this claim before the BIA and we have no jurisdiction to
review it. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1).
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.

-- 2 of 2 --