United States of America v. Alfredo Cesar Ramirez, a.k.a. Alfredo C. Cesar-Ramirez, a.k.a. Alfredo Cesar…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALFREDO CESAR RAMIREZ, a.k.a.
Alfredo C. Cesar-Ramirez, a.k.a. Alfredo
Cesar Cesar-Ramirez, a.k.a. Alfredo
Rodriguez-Ramirez,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10088
D.C. No. 4:12-cr-02079-FRZ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 7, 2015**
Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Alfredo Cesar Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after
FILED
APR 10 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Ramirez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
14-10088 2

-- 2 of 2 --