Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-10093•United States of America v. Jesus Pacheco
14-10093Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17.04.2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JESUS PACHECO,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10093
D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00017-JSW-2
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 29, 2015 **
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Jesus Pacheco appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the
80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to
possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846,
and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21
FILED
APR 17 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §
1291, and we affirm.
Pacheco contends that the district court clearly erred by denying him a minor
role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). In light of the very large quantity
of methamphetamine and Pacheco’s conduct over the course of several days,
including storing methamphetamine at his home, the district court did not clearly
err. See United States v. Hurtado, 760 F.3d 1065, 1068-69 (9th Cir. 2014); United
States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v.
Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-83 (9th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.