Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-55662•United States of America v. David Mednansky, individually and MARTINE MEDNANSKY, individually.
13-55662Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10.11.2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID MEDNANSKY, individually and
MARTINE MEDNANSKY, individually.
Defendants - Appellants.
No. 13-55662
D.C. No. 3:10-cv-01307-MMA-
BGS
ORDER
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed on September 4, 2015, 2015 WL
5167842, is amended as follows:
On page 2, line 13, the text <83.3(g)(1)> is deleted and replaced with
<83.3(f)(1)>.
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no
judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.
Fed. R. App. P. 35. Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
No further petitions shall be entertained.
FILED
NOV 10 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 1 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.