James Raymond Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES RAYMOND ACRES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BLUE LAKE RANCHERIA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-15502
D.C. No. 3:16-cv-05391-WHO
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2017**
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
James Raymond Acres appeals pro se from the district court’s order
dismissing his action for failure to exhaust tribal court remedies. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Slep-Tone Entm’t Corp.
v. Wired for Sound Karaoke & DJ Servs., LLC, 845 F.3d 1246, 1248 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JUN 30 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 17-15502
2017) (motion to dismiss); Boozer v. Wilder, 381 F.3d 931, 934 (9th Cir. 2004)
(exhaustion of tribal court remedies). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Acres’s action because Acres did not
exhaust tribal court remedies and failed to demonstrate that exhaustion was
excused. See Grand Canyon Skywalk Dev., LLC v. ‘Sa’ Nyu Wa Inc., 715 F.3d
1196, 1200-01 (9th Cir. 2013) (a federal court may not make a ruling on tribal
court jurisdiction until tribal court remedies are exhausted and “a tribal court . . .
must have acted in bad faith for exhaustion to be excused”).
We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal or in the reply brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir.
2009).
Acres’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 21) is denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --