Travon Thompson v. RON HOOPS, Sheriff official and individual capacity;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TRAVON THOMPSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RON HOOPS, Sheriff official and individual
capacity; et al.,
Defendants,
and
D. M. BOLOT, Facility Administrator
official and individual capacity; JAMES
HENNING, Facility Chaplain official and
individual capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-55594
D.C. No. 5:11-cv-01535-MMM-
JPR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 26, 2017**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 4 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-55594
Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Travon Thompson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his right to free
exercise of religion during his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In his opening brief, Thompson failed to challenge the district court’s
summary judgment in favor of defendants, or any other district court order, and
therefore Thompson waived any such challenge. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d
1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[A]rguments not raised by a party in its opening brief
are deemed waived.”).
We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --